StatVault

StatVault · Knox Answer Receipt

Receipt rc_d6d25b65c46305

Ask Knox about this →Continue researching this topic with Knox

✓ Verified anchorage

Re-derived from the embedded sibling path. This receipt proves its own anchorage without contacting the live ledger.

Schemav1.9
Issued2026-07-08T06:18:31.896Z
Answer hash (sha256)71e322…6aad67
Merkle root @ issue—
Chain length @ issue—
Evidence refs1
Proof depth0
Leaf index0
Cost claimdeterministic · $0.000000 (served free)
Confidence limited bysources disagree
Memory adjustment+5pp — Memory: 3 consistent prior takes — confidence nudged up 5pp.
Remediation hintOnly one source backs the claim — requiring an extra agreeing source before confident answering (hedging until then).
Band after remediation±11.2pp (widened +1.2pp)

Citation coverage

Sentence-level provenance captured when this receipt was issued. Coverage: 0%.

0/3 cited

  1. Latest evidence review sharpens the weekly story.

    No direct citation attached.

  2. NFL weekly movers: Patrick Mahomes (+1.8), Lamar Jackson (+1.2).

    No direct citation attached.

  3. The best next step is to open Why KC Moved or Beat the Vault and make a call.

    No direct citation attached.

Topic evolution

33 receipts · 0 confidence flips across this topic

  1. 2026-07-02rc_45d21…9eb · conf 78%
  2. 2026-07-02rc_7dbf6…738 · conf 78%
  3. 2026-07-02rc_6dbdf…e35 · conf 78%
  4. 2026-07-02rc_99ae6…02b · conf 78%
  5. 2026-07-03rc_2556c…2f0 · conf 78%
  6. 2026-07-03rc_46b83…832 · conf 78%
  7. 2026-07-03rc_f6391…782 · conf 78%
  8. 2026-07-04rc_2c614…639 · conf 78%
  9. 2026-07-04rc_916d0…4bb · conf 78%
  10. 2026-07-06rc_17078…27c · conf 78%
  11. 2026-07-06rc_e5853…d3b · conf 78%
  12. 2026-07-06rc_28b16…0cc · conf 78%
  13. 2026-07-06rc_1066f…4e9 · conf 78%
  14. 2026-07-06rc_d6af4…f54 · conf 78%
  15. 2026-07-06rc_24d83…724 · conf 78%
  16. 2026-07-07rc_8e81b…7bf · conf 78%
  17. 2026-07-07rc_5c9a9…0d4 · conf 78%
  18. 2026-07-07rc_e968d…85f · conf 78%
  19. 2026-07-07rc_fa93e…9d0 · conf 78%
  20. 2026-07-07rc_d4e36…cb5 · conf 78%
  21. 2026-07-07rc_c740d…396 · conf 78%
  22. 2026-07-07rc_ccf64…64a · conf 78%
  23. 2026-07-07rc_3fff0…1d0 · conf 78%
  24. 2026-07-07rc_51a62…c37 · conf 78%
  25. 2026-07-07rc_a3e3c…aaf · conf 78%
  26. 2026-07-07rc_e9f67…719 · conf 78%
  27. 2026-07-08rc_c1f81…9f5 · conf 78%
  28. 2026-07-08rc_15c77…0ba · conf 78%
  29. 2026-07-08rc_cd9e9…655 · conf 78%
  30. 2026-07-08rc_6ea33…03b · conf 78%
  31. 2026-07-08rc_edf09…1a1 · conf 78%
  32. 2026-07-08rc_7cb1b…1b8 · conf 78%
  33. 2026-07-08rc_d6d25…305 · conf 78%this

Your confidence vs. Knox

Where do you put your confidence? When this answer resolves, both you and Knox get Brier-scored in public.

Crowd (0)
—
Knox
78%
Δ crowd − Knox
—

Inclusion proofs are sha256 Merkle siblings, duplicate-trailing-leaf reduction. Verify offline with the embedded leafHash, siblings, and leafIndex.

Was Knox right?

← All receipts
📋 PassportSubscribe (Atom) →