Not to be confused withAlex Smith (TE · 2005–2015).

Also in other sports:nhlAlex Smith (D · 1925–1935).

Alex Smith is a career quality starter — a quarterback whose body of work places Smith in the top quarter of all players at the position historically. The Knox model values sustained contribution over flash, and Smith's career arc reflects exactly that kind of reliable professional-grade performance.

QBWAS#11ACT

Alex Smith

3× Pro BowlTop 22% all-time QBsHigh-End Starter🏆 Clutch · +12% playoffs 🌅 Early Bloomer · 2005

Height6'4"

Weight

Career Value · VORP

183 career value over replacement — #447 all-time of 4,666. 13.1/season above a replacement-level QB.

Career Profile

2 top-10 seasonstop-10 marks Compiler31% in top 3 yrs 2-phase playertwo-way

Draft OutcomeMiss ↓

Pick #1 (Rd 1) · SF · 2005 · -7.9 vs expected KV-H

56actual

63.9 expected · Δ−7.9

Fan Rating

Rate Alex Smith — All-Time

Tap a star to rate

Explore More

Similar Players

Trevor Lawrence

92% match

Rich Gannon

90% match

Ryan Tannehill

88% match

Daniel Jones

87% match

Geno Smith

86% match

Compare Alex Smith vs Player Report data error

Combined Season Grid

The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.

4 grids split in one view

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Passing													Rushing								Receiving									Snap Counts
Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Cmp	Att	Cmp%	Yds	TD	Int	TD%	Int%	Y/A	AdjY/A	TD:INT	Rate	Sk	Att	Yds	TD	Y/A	TD%	1D	1D%	Fmb	Tgt	Rec	Yds	TD	Ctch%	Y/R	Y/Tgt	AirYd/T	1D	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%
2005	21	SF	9	—	84	165	50.9%	875	1	11	0.6	6.7	5.3	2.4	0.1	40.8	29	30	103	0	3.4	0.0	3	10.0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	22	SF	16	—	259	443	58.5%	2,901	16	15	3.6	3.4	6.5	5.7	1.1	76.0	37	41	151	2	3.7	4.9	12	29.3	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	23	SF	7	—	94	193	48.7%	914	2	4	1.0	2.1	4.7	4.0	0.5	57.2	17	13	89	0	6.8	0.0	5	38.5	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	25	SF	11	—	225	372	60.5%	2,350	18	12	4.8	3.2	6.3	5.8	1.5	81.5	22	24	51	0	2.1	0.0	6	25.0	0	1	1	-6	0	100.0%	-6.0	-6.0	—	0	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	SF	11	—	204	342	59.6%	2,370	14	10	4.1	2.9	6.9	6.4	1.4	82.1	25	18	60	0	3.3	0.0	3	16.7	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	27	SF	16	—	273	445	61.3%	3,144	17	5	3.8	1.1	7.1	7.3	3.4	90.7	44	52	179	2	3.4	3.8	13	25.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	28	SF	10	—	153	218	70.2%	1,737	13	5	6.0	2.3	8.0	8.1	2.6	104.1	24	31	132	0	4.3	0.0	6	19.4	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	KC	15	—	308	508	60.6%	3,313	23	7	4.5	1.4	6.5	6.8	3.3	89.1	39	76	431	1	5.7	1.3	23	30.3	0	1	1	-4	0	100.0%	-4.0	-4.0	—	0	978	96.7%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2014	30	KC	15	—	303	464	65.3%	3,265	18	6	3.9	1.3	7.0	7.2	3.0	93.4	45	49	254	1	5.2	2.0	12	24.5	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	940	99.3%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2015	31	KC	16	—	307	470	65.3%	3,486	20	7	4.3	1.5	7.4	7.6	2.9	95.4	45	84	498	2	5.9	2.4	30	35.7	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	989	98.7%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2016	32	KC	15	—	328	489	67.1%	3,502	15	8	3.1	1.6	7.2	7.0	1.9	91.2	28	48	134	5	2.8	10.4	9	18.8	1	1	1	3	0	100.0%	3.0	3.0	—	0	915	95.4%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2017	33	KC	15	—	341	505	67.5%	4,042	26	5	5.1	1.0	8.0	8.6	5.2	104.7	35	60	355	1	5.9	1.7	19	31.7	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	961	100.0%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2018	34	WAS	10	—	205	328	62.5%	2,180	10	5	3.0	1.5	6.6	6.6	2.0	85.7	22	41	168	1	4.1	2.4	15	36.6	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	651	96.8%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
2020	36	WAS	8	—	168	252	66.7%	1,582	6	8	2.4	3.2	6.3	5.3	0.8	78.5	22	10	3	0	0.3	0.0	0	0.0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	459	85.8%	—	0.0%	—	0.0%
Career		—	174	—	3,252	5,194	62.6%	35,661	199	108	3.8	2.1	6.9	6.7	1.8	87.0	434	577	2,608	15	4.5	2.6	156	27.0	4	3	3	-7	0	100.0%	-2.3	-2.3	—	0	—	—	—	—	—	—