Not to be confused withMichael Davis (RB · 1996).

Michael Davis is a career quality starter — a defensive back whose body of work places Davis in the top half of all players at the position historically. The Knox model values sustained contribution over flash, and Davis's career arc reflects exactly that kind of reliable professional-grade performance.

CBNOACT

Michael Davis

Top 35% all-time defensive backsReliable Starter🌅 Early Bloomer · 2020

Height6'2"

Weight195 lb

BornJan 6, 1996

Age30

College

Combined Season Grid

Season totals or exact team stints. Career totals count each season once.

3 categories · One row per season · Scroll for all statistics

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	VAL	Defense													Snap Counts						Advanced Defense & Coverage (2018+)
Season	Age	Team	G	GS	VAL	Tkl	Solo	Ast	TFL	QBHits	Sk	Dis	Int	PD	FF	FR	TD	Sfty	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%	Tgt	Cmp	Cmp%	RateAll	ADOT	Prss	Hrry	QBKD	Bltz	MissTkl	Miss%
2017	21–22	LAC	15	—	0.0	4	3	1	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	1	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	36	3.5%	281	69.4%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22–23	LAC	16	—	0.0	38	29	9	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	8	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	626	60.4%	186	42.4%	67	42	0.6	101.6	9.1	0	0	0	0	6	0.1
2019	23–24	LAC	12	—	3.1	36	28	8	0	0	0.0	0.0	2	9	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	659	90.7%	61	19.8%	61	36	0.6	76.0	10.4	0	0	0	3	7	0.2
2020	24–25	LAC	16	—	4.1	61	46	15	2	0	0.0	2.0	3	14	0	—	1	0	—	0.0%	958	92.5%	121	26.5%	104	63	0.6	79.2	12.0	0	0	0	2	9	0.1
2021	25–26	LAC	14	—	1.5	49	37	12	1	0	0.0	1.0	1	12	0	2	0	0	—	0.0%	853	89.6%	13	3.7%	86	46	0.5	87.1	9.6	0	0	0	1	6	0.1
2022	26–27	LAC	17	—	2.8	54	40	14	2	1	1.0	4.0	1	15	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	791	75.5%	157	32.5%	70	34	0.5	66.2	11.5	1	0	0	3	1	0.0
2023	27–28	LAC	17	—	1.0	57	47	10	3	0	0.0	3.0	1	10	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	885	76.7%	109	24.6%	89	58	0.7	119.2	12.2	1	1	0	1	9	0.1
2024	28–29	WAS	15	—	0.0	9	6	3	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	1	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	138	14.7%	188	45.2%	21	15	0.7	96.1	6.6	0	0	0	0	3	0.2
2025	29–30	NO	11	—	0.0	4	2	2	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	0	0	—	0	0	—	0.0%	9	1.1%	113	43.4%	1	0	0.0	39.6	19.0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0
Career		—	133	—	12.5	312	238	74	8	1	1.0	10.0	8	70	0	2	1	0	—	0.0%	4,955	57.6%	1,229	34.3%	499	294	—	—	—	2	1	0	10	41	—

Career Value · VORP

55 career value over replacement — #1975 all-time of 4,695. 6.9/season above a replacement-level CB.

Fan Rating

Rate Michael Davis — All-Time

Tap a star to rate

Explore More

Similar Players

Ike Taylor

94% match

Charvarius Ward

88% match

George Teague

88% match

Denard Walker

87% match

Deonte Banks

86% match

Compare Michael Davis vs Player Report data error

ConferenceIndependent

Career arc · VAL by season

9 seasons · peak 4.1 in 2020

VAL (Value Above League) measures each NFL season against that season's league; the dashed line is zero — a season that added nothing above the league's fringe. ● peak · ○ league-best season.

What he added · wins above replacement

1.0 career wins over 9 seasons · 1 win = 13.08 VAL

Best season · 2020 · +0.3 wins

0.3 of LAC's 7 wins (4%)

Defence+0.3

Latest season · 2025 · −0.1 wins

NO's 6 wins · no wins above replacement this season

Defence−0.1

VAL 3.0 measures each part of a NFL player's game in his sport's own currency against what that season's fringe players produced, converted to team wins with rates fitted from every team-season in the encyclopedia. Team wins are the club's actual regular-season wins; a traded season, or one whose club record is missing, shows no share.

Position percentile · DB

#382 of 1,089 all-time defensive backs by KV-H

065th percentile100

StatVault · statvault.org/players/nfl/michael-davis-2017JSON

Defense

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Tkl	Solo	Ast	TFL	QBHits	Sk	Dis	Int	PD	FR	TD	VAL
2017	21–22	LAC	3	0*	4	3	1	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	1	—	0	0
2018	22–23	LAC	11	10*	38	29	9	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	8	—	0	0
2019	23–24	LAC	11	11*	36	28	8	0	0	0.0	0.0	2	9	—	0	3.1
2020	24–25	LAC	16	15*	61	46	15	2	0	0.0	2.0	3	14	—	1	4.1
2021	25–26	LAC	14	13*	49	37	12	1	0	0.0	1.0	1	12	2	0	1.5
2022	26–27	LAC	14	13*	54	40	14	2	1	1.0	4.0	1	15	—	0	2.8
2023	27–28	LAC	13	13*	57	47	10	3	0	0.0	3.0	1	10	—	0	1
2024	28–29	WAS	5	0*	9	6	3	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	1	—	0	0
2025	29–30	NO	4	0*	4	2	2	0	0	0.0	0.0	0	0	—	0	0
Career			91	75*	312	238	74	8	1	1.0	10.0	8	70	2	1	12.5

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

Snap Counts

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Off	Off%	Def	Def%	ST	ST%
2017	21–22	LAC	15	0*	—	0.0%	36	3.5%	281	69.4%
2018	22–23	LAC	16	10*	—	0.0%	626	60.4%	186	42.4%
2019	23–24	LAC	12	11*	—	0.0%	659	90.7%	61	19.8%
2020	24–25	LAC	16	15*	—	0.0%	958	92.5%	121	26.5%
2021	25–26	LAC	14	13*	—	0.0%	853	89.6%	13	3.7%
2022	26–27	LAC	17	13*	—	0.0%	791	75.5%	157	32.5%
2023	27–28	LAC	17	13*	—	0.0%	885	76.7%	109	24.6%
2024	28–29	WAS	15	0*	—	0.0%	138	14.7%	188	45.2%
2025	29–30	NO	11	0*	—	0.0%	9	1.1%	113	43.4%
Career			133	75*	—	0.0%	4,955	57.6%	1,229	34.3%

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

Advanced Defense & Coverage (2018+)

Season	Age	Team	G	GS	Tgt	Cmp	Cmp%	RateAll	ADOT	Prss	Hrry	Bltz	MissTkl	Miss%
2018	22–23	LAC	16	10*	67	42	0.6	101.6	9.1	0	0	0	6	0.1
2019	23–24	LAC	12	11*	61	36	0.6	76.0	10.4	0	0	3	7	0.2
2020	24–25	LAC	16	15*	104	63	0.6	79.2	12.0	0	0	2	9	0.1
2021	25–26	LAC	14	13*	86	46	0.5	87.1	9.6	0	0	1	6	0.1
2022	26–27	LAC	17	13*	70	34	0.5	66.2	11.5	1	0	3	1	0.0
2023	27–28	LAC	17	13*	89	58	0.7	119.2	12.2	1	1	1	9	0.1
2024	28–29	WAS	15	0*	21	15	0.7	96.1	6.6	0	0	0	3	0.2
2025	29–30	NO	11	0*	1	0	0.0	39.6	19.0	0	0	0	0	0.0
Career			118	75*	499	294	—	—	—	2	1	10	41	—

* GS not available from free sources — SG* estimated from snap share (nflverse 2012+)

KV-H Anatomy

KV-H 57 · Strong Starter

A strong starter career by KV-H: a peak-driven profile that scores 57 of 100, era-normalized against int/g peers across 8 scored seasons.

Sustained

career value

×.6

Peak

best 3 seasons

×.4

×1

Longevity

career length

Blend 56.8 × longevity 1 = KV-H 57· confidence 89%

What builds the career mark of 54

On-field 39.2

Availability 14.8

On-field production Staying available

Season-by-season quality (era-relative int/g)

2018bestavg 48elite 702025

INTs career shape vs similar cornerbacks

2019-2023

Peak-aligned view: center line is each player's best INTs season; left/right show build-up, staying power, and decline. Comparison set uses same-position, overlapping-era comps when available.