Travis Kelce is one of the most consistent tight ends of his generation — a player whose career coefficient of variation places him among the most reliable performers at the position. Year in, year out, Kelce delivered without dramatic peaks or valleys — the kind of player who earns trust, not headlines.
Career Value · VORP
533 career value over replacement — #10 all-time of 4,695. 44.4/season above a replacement-level TE.
Pick #63 (Rd 3) · KC · 2013 · +50.9 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Travis Kelce — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
Season totals or exact team stints. Career totals count each season once.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | VAL | Receiving | Rushing | Snap Counts | Passing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | Int | TD% | Int% | Y/A | AdjY/A | TD:INT | Rate | Sk | ||||||
| 2013 | 23–24 | KC | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 4.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24–25 | KC | 16 | — | 8.3 | 87 | 67 | 862 | 5 | 77.0% | 12.9 | 9.9 | — | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 668 | 67.6% | — | 0.0% | 69 | 16.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25–26 | KC | 16 | — | 7.8 | 103 | 72 | 875 | 5 | 69.9% | 12.2 | 8.5 | — | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 923 | 92.2% | — | 0.0% | 78 | 17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 26–27 | KC | 16 | — | 10.5 | 117 | 85 | 1,125 | 4 | 72.6% | 13.2 | 9.6 | — | 55 | 1 | -5 | 0 | -5.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 886 | 86.1% | — | 0.0% | 14 | 3.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 27–28 | KC | 15 | — | 9.6 | 122 | 83 | 1,038 | 8 | 68.0% | 12.5 | 8.5 | — | 55 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 2 | 100.0 | 0 | 872 | 91.6% | 1 | 0.1% | — | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | -45.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 28–29 | KC | 16 | — | 13.6 | 150 | 103 | 1,336 | 10 | 68.7% | 13.0 | 8.9 | — | 68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 993 | 94.8% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 29–30 | KC | 16 | — | 12.1 | 136 | 97 | 1,229 | 5 | 71.3% | 12.7 | 9.0 | — | 65 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4.0 | 100.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 971 | 92.0% | 1 | 0.1% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 30–31 | KC | 15 | — | 15.5 | 145 | 105 | 1,416 | 11 | 72.4% | 13.5 | 9.8 | — | 79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 899 | 85.5% | 1 | 0.1% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | — | 56.3 | 0 |
| 2021 | 31–32 | KC | 16 | — | 12.0 | 134 | 92 | 1,125 | 9 | 68.7% | 12.2 | 8.4 | — | 62 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1.5 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 926 | 82.1% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 32–33 | KC | 17 | — | 14.6 | 152 | 110 | 1,338 | 12 | 72.4% | 12.2 | 8.8 | — | 78 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 914 | 79.6% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 33–34 | KC | 15 | — | 10.2 | 121 | 93 | 984 | 5 | 76.9% | 10.6 | 8.1 | — | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 775 | 77.0% | 2 | 0.1% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 34–35 | KC | 16 | — | 6.9 | 133 | 97 | 823 | 3 | 72.9% | 8.5 | 6.2 | — | 46 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 940 | 84.6% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 35–36 | KC | 17 | — | 7.4 | 108 | 76 | 851 | 5 | 70.4% | 11.2 | 7.9 | — | 46 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 902 | 81.9% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 36–37 | KC | 6 | — | 2.5 | 35 | 24 | 343 | 2 | 68.6% | 14.3 | 9.8 | — | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 292 | 77.8% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 198 | — | 131.0 | 1,543 | 1,104 | 13,345 | 84 | 71.5% | 12.1 | 8.6 | — | 707 | 10 | 16 | 2 | 1.6 | 20.0 | 5 | 50.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 1.3 | -13.7 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 0 | |
Regular-season all-time ranks
Postseason all-time ranks
A top 1% all-time tight end with excellent availability over their career and elite per-snap production (top 5% in their position group). The rarest archetype in the game — dominance, efficiency, and health in one player.
#5 all-time in Rec (1,104). 124 behind Jason Witten for #4 — on pace in ~2 seasons
Worth 533 points of value above a freely-available replacement tight end — top 1% of all 4,695 ranked at the position. 12 of 12 seasons cleared the replacement bar, by +44.4 on average.See board →
Seasons above replacement
12 seasons × ~44.4 surplus ≈ VORP 533
Pete Pihos
TE
92% match
2013 Draft ClassmatesFull class →
Famous Partnership
Chris Jones
10 shared seasons · combined KV-H 1728