Zach Ertz ranks in the all-time elite tier for tight ends — a career that places Ertz in the top 3% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Ertz a career score of 87, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.
Career Value · VORP
360 career value over replacement — #63 all-time of 4,695. 27.7/season above a replacement-level TE.
Career Profile
Pick #35 (Rd 2) · PHI · 2013 · +32.2 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Zach Ertz — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
Season totals or exact team stints. Career totals count each season once.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | Rushing | Snap Counts | Defense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | Tkl | Solo | Ast | TFL | QBHits | Sk | Dis | Int | PD | FF | FR | TD | Sfty | |||||
| 2013 | 22–23 | PHI | 16 | — | 56 | 36 | 469 | 4 | 64.3% | 13.0 | 8.4 | — | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 450 | 40.9% | — | 0.0% | 167 | 34.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23–24 | PHI | 16 | — | 89 | 58 | 702 | 3 | 65.2% | 12.1 | 7.9 | — | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 588 | 50.4% | — | 0.0% | 210 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 24–25 | PHI | 15 | — | 112 | 75 | 853 | 2 | 67.0% | 11.4 | 7.6 | — | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 789 | 71.5% | — | 0.0% | 83 | 17.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25–26 | PHI | 14 | — | 106 | 78 | 816 | 4 | 73.6% | 10.5 | 7.7 | — | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 849 | 85.6% | — | 0.0% | 137 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 26–27 | PHI | 14 | — | 110 | 74 | 824 | 8 | 67.3% | 11.1 | 7.5 | — | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 776 | 79.5% | — | 0.0% | 83 | 20.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27–28 | PHI | 16 | — | 156 | 116 | 1,163 | 8 | 74.4% | 10.0 | 7.5 | — | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,000 | 91.6% | — | 0.0% | 2 | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28–29 | PHI | 15 | — | 135 | 88 | 916 | 6 | 65.2% | 10.4 | 6.8 | — | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 932 | 85.1% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 29–30 | PHI | 11 | — | 72 | 36 | 335 | 1 | 50.0% | 9.3 | 4.7 | — | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 635 | 81.3% | — | 0.0% | 10 | 2.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 30–31 | ARI / PHI | 17 | — | 112 | 74 | 763 | 5 | 66.1% | 10.3 | 6.8 | — | 40 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 849 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 31–32 | ARI | 10 | — | 69 | 47 | 406 | 4 | 68.1% | 8.6 | 5.9 | — | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 575 | 78.6% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 1.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 32–33 | ARI | 7 | — | 43 | 27 | 187 | 1 | 62.8% | 6.9 | 4.3 | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 295 | 64.9% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 33–34 | WAS | 17 | — | 91 | 66 | 654 | 7 | 72.5% | 9.9 | 7.2 | — | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 771 | 66.9% | — | 0.0% | 2 | 0.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 34–35 | WAS | 13 | — | 72 | 50 | 504 | 4 | 69.4% | 10.1 | 7.0 | — | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 551 | 66.5% | — | 0.0% | 1 | 0.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 35–36 | PHI | 3 | — | 8 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 37.5% | 7.3 | 2.8 | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39 | 23.3% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 184 | — | 1,231 | 828 | 8,614 | 57 | 67.3% | 10.4 | 7.0 | — | 460 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
Regular-season all-time ranks
Postseason all-time ranks
A top 5% all-time tight end with reliable availability and above-average snap-level impact. The rarest archetype in the game — dominance, efficiency, and health in one player.
#35 all-time in Rec (828). 23 behind Irving Fryar for #34 — on pace in ~1 season
Worth 360 points of value above a freely-available replacement tight end — top 2% of all 4,695 ranked at the position. 12 of 13 seasons cleared the replacement bar, by +30 on average.See board →
Seasons above replacement
12 seasons × ~30 surplus ≈
Eric Ebron
TE
88% match
2013 Draft ClassmatesFull class →