Jason Witten ranks in the all-time elite tier for tight ends — a career that places Witten in the top 1% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Witten a career score of 97, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.
Jason Witten
11× Pro Bowl2× All-ProTop 0% all-time TEsIron Legend👑 #1 Tight End · 2012🌅 Early Bloomer · 2004Team Carrier · #166
Height6'6"
Weight263 lb
BornMay 6, 1982
Age
Combined Season Grid
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
4 grids split in one view
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | Snap Counts | Passing | Advanced Receiving (2018+) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | Int | TD% | Int% | Y/A | AdjY/A | TD:INT | Rate | Sk | ADOT | YBC/R | YAC/R | BrkTkl | Drops | Drop% | 1D | TgtRate | |||||
| 2003 | 21 | DAL | 11 | — | 35 | 35 | 347 | 1 | 100.0% | 9.9 | 9.9 | — | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 22 | DAL | 16 | — | 87 | 87 | 980 | 6 | 100.0% | 11.3 | 11.3 | — | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 23 | DAL | 16 | — | 66 | 66 | 757 | 6 | 100.0% | 11.5 | 11.5 | — | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 24 | DAL | 16 | — | 64 | 64 | 754 | 1 | 100.0% | 11.8 | 11.8 | — | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 25 | DAL | 16 | — | 96 | 96 | 1,145 | 7 | 100.0% | 11.9 | 11.9 | — | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 26 | DAL | 15 | — | 81 | 81 | 952 | 4 | 100.0% | 11.8 | 11.8 | — | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | — | 118.8 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 27 | DAL | 16 | — | 124 | 94 | 1,030 | 2 | 75.8% | 11.0 | 8.3 | — | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 28 | DAL | 16 | — | 128 | 94 | 1,002 | 9 | 73.4% | 10.7 | 7.8 | — | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 29 | DAL | 16 | — | 117 | 79 | 942 | 5 | 67.5% | 11.9 | 8.1 | — | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 30 | DAL | 16 | — | 149 | 110 | 1,039 | 3 | 73.8% | 9.4 | 7.0 | — | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 31 | DAL | 16 | — | 111 | 73 | 851 | 8 | 65.8% | 11.7 | 7.7 | — | 44 | 985 | 98.5% | — | 0.0% | 79 | 16.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 32 | DAL | 16 | — | 90 | 64 | 703 | 5 | 71.1% | 11.0 | 7.8 | — | 48 | 1,049 | 98.9% | — | 0.0% | 88 | 19.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 33 | DAL | 16 | — | 104 | 77 | 713 | 3 | 74.0% | 9.3 | 6.9 | — | 36 | 1,020 | 99.2% | — | 0.0% | 59 | 13.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 34 | DAL | 15 | — | 95 | 69 | 673 | 3 | 72.6% | 9.8 | 7.1 | — | 33 | 1,016 | 95.4% | — | 0.0% | 84 | 19.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 35 | DAL | 16 | — | 87 | 63 | 560 | 5 | 72.4% | 8.9 | 6.4 | — | 26 | 1,048 | 98.5% | — | 0.0% | 70 | 16.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 37 | DAL | 16 | — | 83 | 63 | 529 | 4 | 75.9% | 8.4 | 6.4 | — | 27 | 845 | 75.3% | — | 0.0% | 91 | 20.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.6 | 5.8 | 2.6 | 0 | 6 | 0.1 | 27 | 108.0 |
| 2020 | 38 | LV | 10 | — | 17 | 13 | 69 | 2 | 76.5% | 5.3 | 4.1 | — | 8 | 405 | 37.5% | — | 0.0% | 36 | 7.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.4 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 8 | 121.9 |
| Career | — | 259 | — | 1,534 | 1,228 | 13,046 | 74 | 80.1% | 10.6 | 8.5 | — | 667 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.0 | 42.0 | — | 118.8 | 0 | — | — | — | 0 | 6 | — | 35 | — | |
Career Value · VORP
542 career value over replacement — #9 all-time of 4,666. 31.9/season above a replacement-level TE.
Career Profile
Draft OutcomeSteal ↑
Pick #69 (Rd 3) · DAL · 2003 · +54 vs expected KV-H
97actual
43 expected · Δ+54
Fan Rating
Rate Jason Witten — All-Time
Tap a star to rate
Explore More
Similar Players