Matthew Stafford is one of the most consistent quarterbacks of his generation — a player whose career coefficient of variation places him among the most reliable performers at the position. Year in, year out, Stafford delivered without dramatic peaks or valleys — the kind of player who earns trust, not headlines.
Matthew Stafford
Combined Season Grid
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
4 grids split in one view
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Defense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cmp | Att | Cmp% | Yds | TD | Int | TD% | Int% | Y/A | AdjY/A | TD:INT | Rate | Sk | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Tkl | Solo | Ast | TFL | QBHits | Sk | Dis | Int | PD | FF | FR | TD | Sfty | |||||
| 2009 | 21–22 | DET | 10 | — | 201 | 377 | 53.3% | 2,267 | 13 | 20 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 61.0 | 23 | 21 | 108 | 2 | 5.1 | 9.5 | 6 | 28.6 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22–23 | DET | 4 | — | 57 | 96 | 59.4% | 535 | 6 | 1 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 5.6 | 6.4 | 6.0 | 91.3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 2.8 | 25.0 | 1 | 25.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 23–24 | DET | 16 | — | 428 | 673 | 63.6% | 5,100 | 41 | 16 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 97.1 | 38 | 22 | 78 | 0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 6 | 27.3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24–25 | DET | 16 | — | 435 | 727 | 59.8% | 4,967 | 20 | 17 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 1.2 | 79.8 | 29 | 35 | 126 | 4 | 3.6 | 11.4 | 11 | 31.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% | 3.0 | 3.0 | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 25–26 | DET | 16 | — | 371 | 634 | 58.5% | 4,650 | 29 | 19 | 4.6 | 3.0 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 84.2 | 23 | 37 | 69 | 2 | 1.9 | 5.4 | 12 | 32.4 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 26–27 | DET | 16 | — | 363 | 602 | 60.3% | 4,257 | 22 | 12 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 1.8 | 85.7 | 45 | 43 | 93 | 2 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 8 | 18.6 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27–28 | DET | 16 | — | 398 | 592 | 67.2% | 4,262 | 32 | 13 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 2.5 | 97.0 | 44 | 44 | 159 | 1 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 13 | 29.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6 | 0 | 100.0% | -6.0 | -6.0 | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 28–29 | DET | 16 | — | 388 | 594 | 65.3% | 4,327 | 24 | 10 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 7.3 | 7.3 | 2.4 | 93.3 | 37 | 37 | 207 | 2 | 5.6 | 5.4 | 15 | 40.5 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 29–30 | DET | 16 | — | 371 | 565 | 65.7% | 4,446 | 29 | 10 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 7.9 | 8.1 | 2.9 | 99.3 | 47 | 29 | 98 | 0 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 9 | 31.0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 30–31 | DET | 16 | — | 367 | 555 | 66.1% | 3,777 | 21 | 11 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 6.8 | 6.7 | 1.9 | 89.9 | 40 | 25 | 71 | 0 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 8 | 32.0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 31–32 | DET | 8 | — | 187 | 291 | 64.3% | 2,499 | 19 | 5 | 6.5 | 1.7 | 8.6 | 9.1 | 3.8 | 106.0 | 18 | 20 | 66 | 0 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 5 | 25.0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 32–33 | DET | 16 | — | 339 | 528 | 64.2% | 4,084 | 26 | 10 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 2.6 | 96.3 | 38 | 29 | 112 | 0 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 12 | 41.4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | — | 0.0 | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 33–34 | LAR | 17 | — | 404 | 601 | 67.2% | 4,886 | 41 | 17 | 6.8 | 2.8 | 8.1 | 8.2 | 2.4 | 102.9 | 30 | 32 | 43 | 0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 8 | 25.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–35 | LAR | 9 | — | 206 | 303 | 68.0% | 2,087 | 10 | 8 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 6.9 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 87.4 | 29 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 0.7 | 7.7 | 3 | 23.1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 35–36 | LAR | 15 | — | 326 | 521 | 62.6% | 3,965 | 24 | 11 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 2.2 | 92.5 | 30 | 21 | 65 | 0 | 3.1 | 0.0 | 4 | 19.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 36–37 | LAR | 16 | — | 340 | 517 | 65.8% | 3,762 | 20 | 8 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 7.4 | 2.5 | 93.7 | 28 | 30 | 41 | 0 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 10 | 33.3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 37–38 | LAR | 17 | — | 388 | 597 | 65.0% | 4,707 | 46 | 8 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 7.9 | 8.8 | 5.8 | 109.2 | 23 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Career | — | 240 | — | 5,569 | 8,773 | 63.5% | 64,578 | 423 | 196 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 7.4 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 92.4 | 526 | 471 | 1,357 | 15 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 131 | 27.8 | 8 | 3 | 2 | -3 | 0 | 66.7% | -1.5 | -1.0 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | |
Career Value · VORP
516 career value over replacement — #15 all-time of 4,666. 30.4/season above a replacement-level QB.
Career Profile
Draft OutcomeValue ↑
Pick #1 (Rd 1) · DET · 2009 · +15.1 vs expected KV-H
79actual
63.9 expected · Δ+15.1
Fan Rating
Rate Matthew Stafford — All-Time
Tap a star to rate
Explore More
Similar Players