Delanie Walker ranks in the all-time elite tier for tight ends — a career that places Walker in the top 10% of all players at the position. The Knox value model assigns Walker a career score of 74, reflecting sustained impact that most players at the position never approach.
Career Value · VORP
199 career value over replacement — #386 all-time of 4,695. 16.6/season above a replacement-level TE.
Career Profile
Pick #175 (Rd 6) · SF · 2006 · +50.2 vs expected KV-H
Fan Rating
Rate Delanie Walker — All-Time
Explore More
Similar Players
Season totals or exact team stints. Career totals count each season once.
| Season | Age | Team | G | GS | Receiving | Rushing | Snap Counts | Defense | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Ctch% | Y/R | Y/Tgt | AirYd/T | 1D | Att | Yds | TD | Y/A | TD% | 1D | 1D% | Fmb | Off | Off% | Def | Def% | ST | ST% | Tkl | Solo | Ast | TFL | QBHits | Sk | Dis | Int | PD | FF | FR | TD | Sfty | |||||
| 2006 | 22 | SF | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 100.0% | 15.0 | 15.0 | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 23 | SF | 11 | — | 21 | 21 | 174 | 1 | 100.0% | 8.3 | 8.3 | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 24 | SF | 9 | — | 10 | 10 | 155 | 1 | 100.0% | 15.5 | 15.5 | — | 7 | 2 | -13 | 0 | -6.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 25 | SF | 12 | — | 33 | 21 | 233 | 0 | 63.6% | 11.1 | 7.1 | — | 10 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 11.3 | 0.0 | 2 | 66.7 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 26 | SF | 13 | — | 45 | 29 | 331 | 0 | 64.4% | 11.4 | 7.4 | — | 13 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 33.3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 27 | SF | 12 | — | 35 | 19 | 198 | 3 | 54.3% | 10.4 | 5.7 | — | 9 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1 | 33.3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 28 | SF | 15 | — | 39 | 21 | 344 | 3 | 53.8% | 16.4 | 8.8 | — | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 29 | TEN | 15 | — | 86 | 60 | 571 | 6 | 69.8% | 9.5 | 6.6 | — | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 763 | 74.9% | — | 0.0% | 19 | 4.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 30 | TEN | 15 | — | 106 | 63 | 890 | 4 | 59.4% | 14.1 | 8.4 | — | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 772 | 83.4% | — | 0.0% | 5 | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31 | TEN | 15 | — | 133 | 94 | 1,088 | 6 | 70.7% | 11.6 | 8.2 | — | 52 | 1 | 36 | 0 | 36.0 | 0.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 686 | 72.3% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 32 | TEN | 15 | — | 102 | 65 | 800 | 7 | 63.7% | 12.3 | 7.8 | — | 35 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 709 | 71.5% | — | 0.0% | 3 | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 33 | TEN | 16 | — | 111 | 74 | 807 | 3 | 66.7% | 10.9 | 7.3 | — | 43 | 2 | -2 | 1 | -1.0 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 0 | 742 | 72.6% | — | 0.0% | 4 | 0.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 34 | TEN | 1 | — | 7 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 57.1% | 13.0 | 7.4 | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39 | 57.0% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 35 | TEN | 7 | — | 31 | 21 | 215 | 2 | 67.7% | 10.2 | 6.9 | — | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 193 | 42.9% | — | 0.0% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 157 | — | 761 | 504 | 5,888 | 36 | 66.2% | 11.7 | 7.7 | — | 272 | 16 | 89 | 1 | 5.6 | 6.3 | 7 | 43.8 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | |
A top 10% all-time tight end with reliable availability and excellent per-snap efficiency. The rarest archetype in the game — dominance, efficiency, and health in one player.
Worth 199 points of value above a freely-available replacement tight end — top 9% of all 4,695 ranked at the position. 10 of 12 seasons cleared the replacement bar, by +19.9 on average.See board →
Seasons above replacement
10 seasons × ~19.9 surplus ≈
Mike Ditka
TE
90% match
2006 Draft ClassmatesFull class →