Josh Jacobs NFL Stats, Career Profile & VAL | StatVault
Also in other sports:nhlJosh Jacobs (D · 2019–2020).
✦
Josh Jacobs is one of the most consistent running backs of his generation — a player whose career coefficient of variation places him among the most reliable performers at the position. Year in, year out, Jacobs delivered without dramatic peaks or valleys — the kind of player who earns trust, not headlines.
The full season-by-season grids, joined on one timeline. Every selected stat family stays visible at once—no tab hopping. Switch to Combined to fold the selected families into unified totals—yards from scrimmage, total TDs, touches.
Source: nflverse (CC-BY 4.0) · 2016–present · 18 games
Splits
92 games · 2019–2024
Folded from the per-game logs on file. Home/away, result, month and division come from the NFL schedule feed; where a game has no schedule row those dimensions leave it out rather than guess, and the count is shown.
Home / Away2 rows · 13 not classified
Home / Away
G
Sk
Rush
Rush Yds
Rush TD
Tgt
Rec
Rec Yds
Rec TD
FPts
Home
40
1
721
3039
28
146
116
736
1
543.5
Away
39
—
674
2849
27
132
104
972
—
534.1
13 of 92 games have no schedule row for this dimension and are excluded from the rows above rather than assigned a bucket.
Wins / Losses2 rows · 13 not classified
Wins / Losses
G
Sk
Rush
Rush Yds
Rush TD
Tgt
Rec
Rec Yds
Rec TD
FPts
Wins
37
1
786
3422
38
113
90
804
1
646.6
Losses
42
—
609
2466
17
165
130
Regular season / Postseason2 rows
Regular season / Postseason
G
Sk
Rush
Rush Yds
Rush TD
Tgt
Rec
Rec Yds
Rec TD
FPts
Regular season
90
1
1606
6874
61
297
233
1790
1
1218.4
Postseason
2
—
31
164
1
8
7
By opponent31 rows
By opponent
G
Sk
Rush
Rush Yds
Rush TD
Tgt
Rec
Rec Yds
Rec TD
FPts
vs ARI
2
—
37
131
—
4
4
40
—
17.1
vs ATL
1
—
7
27
—
3
3
17
By month5 rows · 13 not classified
By month
G
Sk
Rush
Rush Yds
Rush TD
Tgt
Rec
Rec Yds
Rec TD
FPts
January
8
—
128
606
7
24
20
146
—
117.2
September
14
—
236
915
5
46
35
Division games2 rows · 13 not classified
Division games
G
Sk
Rush
Rush Yds
Rush TD
Tgt
Rec
Rec Yds
Rec TD
FPts
Division
27
—
477
2138
23
91
73
568
—
400.6
Non-division
52
1
918
3750
32
187
147
KV-H Anatomy
KV-H 79 · Great
A great career by KV-H: a peak-driven profile that scores 79 of 100, era-normalized against rush yds/g peers across 7 scored seasons.
13 of 92 games have no schedule row for this dimension and are excluded from the rows above rather than assigned a bucket.
84
—
30.8
—
2.4
vs BAL
1
—
10
34
2
2
1
6
—
16
vs BUF
2
—
24
46
—
10
8
76
—
12.2
vs CAR
1
—
25
93
3
6
4
46
—
31.9
vs CHI
5
—
76
326
5
18
13
105
—
73.1
vs CIN
3
—
45
232
—
15
12
80
—
29.2
vs CLE
2
—
46
181
—
5
3
42
—
22.3
vs DAL
1
—
22
87
1
4
2
25
—
17.2
vs DEN
8
—
173
769
9
23
17
181
—
147
vs DET
4
—
74
342
6
9
4
40
—
74.2
vs GB
2
1
41
193
1
8
8
30
—
28.3
vs HOU
3
—
47
285
3
11
10
43
1
56.8
vs IND
5
—
99
420
2
19
15
99
—
61.9
vs JAX
3
—
66
283
2
8
6
38
—
44.1
vs KC
9
—
143
684
5
29
24
142
—
110.6
vs LA
2
—
46
172
2
3
3
36
—
32.8
vs LAC
8
—
148
643
6
30
25
203
—
118.6
vs MIA
3
—
46
151
1
7
5
86
—
29.7
vs MIN
4
—
49
198
1
10
6
43
—
28.1
vs NE
3
—
63
241
—
12
7
45
—
26.6
vs NO
3
—
50
200
1
11
9
66
—
32.6
vs NYG
2
—
39
174
2
4
4
19
—
31.3
vs NYJ
2
—
37
150
—
3
3
13
—
14.3
vs PHI
3
—
40
194
2
9
8
99
—
41.3
vs PIT
2
—
32
106
—
6
4
24
—
13
vs SEA
2
—
59
323
3
11
10
116
—
59.9
vs SF
2
—
43
175
4
6
4
26
—
44.1
vs TB
1
—
10
17
—
4
3
14
—
3.1
vs TEN
2
—
27
109
—
6
6
36
—
14.5
vs WAS
1
—
13
52
1
9
9
38
—
15
284
—
145.9
October
20
1
339
1434
17
84
64
457
1
297.1
November
21
—
399
1770
16
74
60
497
—
318.7
December
16
—
293
1163
10
50
41
324
—
198.7
13 of 92 games have no schedule row for this dimension and are excluded from the rows above rather than assigned a bucket.
1140
1
677
13 of 92 games have no schedule row for this dimension and are excluded from the rows above rather than assigned a bucket.
Rush Yds career shape vs similar running backs
2019-2025
Peak-aligned view: center line is each player's best Rush Yds season; left/right show build-up, staying power, and decline. Comparison set uses same-position, overlapping-era comps when available.